Metropolitan Concentration
Young single adults continue migrating toward Tokyo, Fukuoka, and other employment hubs, sustaining renter-pool growth in a handful of prefectures even as the national population declines.
All 47 Prefectures Ranked by Projected Household Growth Through 2040 for Two Investor Cohorts
Updated June 27, 2026
Data Source: IPSS 2024 (9th edition) | Analysis & Insights: © Tatemono IQ
Japan's population is shrinking, but housing demand is not falling evenly — it is concentrating. This scorecard ranks all 47 prefectures by the projected 2025→2040 growth in households for two investor-relevant cohorts: single adults aged 25–39 (the core renter pool for compact urban units) and single seniors aged 65 and over (the demand base for senior housing). For young singles, only a small group of prefectures — led by Okinawa and the major metropolitan employment hubs — still shows positive household growth, while most of the country faces a measurable headwind. For seniors, every one of the 47 prefectures shows a tailwind as the population ages and solo living rises. The two rankings share their leaders — Okinawa ranks #1 for both cohorts, and half of the top ten appear on both lists — but they diverge sharply beyond that overlap, and that divergence is the core investment signal: the right prefecture depends heavily on which cohort you are housing. Every figure is a direct export of IPSS 2024 9th-edition projections, run through the same demographic scoring Tatemono IQ uses inside its live product.
All 47 prefectures ranked by the projected 2025→2040 compound annual growth rate of single-person households aged 25–39 — the core renter pool for compact 1K/1DK units. Source: IPSS 2024 9th-edition projections.
| Rank | Prefecture | CAGR 2025→2040 | Demand Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Okinawa | +0.3% | Mild Tailwind |
| 02 | Hiroshima | +0.3% | Neutral |
| 03 | Kagawa | +0.2% | Neutral |
| 04 | Fukuoka | +0.2% | Neutral |
| 05 | Chiba | +0.2% | Neutral |
| 06 | Saitama | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 07 | Tokyo | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 08 | Tottori | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 09 | Kanagawa | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 10 | Ishikawa | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 11 | Shiga | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 12 | Kumamoto | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 13 | Oita | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 14 | Aichi | +0.1% | Neutral |
| 15 | Hyogo | +0% | Neutral |
| 16 | Saga | +0% | Neutral |
| 17 | Miyazaki | -0% | Neutral |
| 18 | Shizuoka | -0% | Neutral |
| 19 | Shimane | -0% | Neutral |
| 20 | Yamaguchi | -0% | Neutral |
| 21 | Tochigi | -0% | Neutral |
| 22 | Toyama | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 23 | Kagoshima | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 24 | Okayama | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 25 | Ehime | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 26 | Ibaraki | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 27 | Gunma | -0.1% | Neutral |
| 28 | Fukui | -0.2% | Neutral |
| 29 | Mie | -0.2% | Neutral |
| 30 | Gifu | -0.2% | Neutral |
| 31 | Kyoto | -0.2% | Neutral |
| 32 | Miyagi | -0.2% | Neutral |
| 33 | Nagasaki | -0.3% | Mild Headwind |
| 34 | Nagano | -0.3% | Mild Headwind |
| 35 | Nara | -0.4% | Mild Headwind |
| 36 | Osaka | -0.4% | Mild Headwind |
| 37 | Niigata | -0.5% | Mild Headwind |
| 38 | Kochi | -0.5% | Mild Headwind |
| 39 | Hokkaido | -0.6% | Mild Headwind |
| 40 | Yamanashi | -0.6% | Mild Headwind |
| 41 | Tokushima | -0.7% | Mild Headwind |
| 42 | Yamagata | -0.7% | Mild Headwind |
| 43 | Wakayama | -0.8% | Mild Headwind |
| 44 | Iwate | -0.9% | Mild Headwind |
| 45 | Fukushima | -1.2% | Mild Headwind |
| 46 | Akita | -1.3% | Mild Headwind |
| 47 | Aomori | -1.5% | Strong Headwind |
Household CAGR 2025→2040 · IPSS 2024 · Tokyo highlighted
Diverging bars show the annualized 2025→2040 household CAGR. Bars to the right (green) indicate demographic tailwinds; bars to the left (amber/red) indicate headwinds. Shows the five strongest and five weakest prefectures plus Tokyo for reference.
All 47 prefectures ranked by the projected 2025→2040 compound annual growth rate of single-person households aged 65 and over — the demand base for senior housing, accessible rentals, and care-adjacent property. Source: IPSS 2024 9th-edition projections.
| Rank | Prefecture | CAGR 2025→2040 | Demand Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Okinawa | +2.5% | Strong Tailwind |
| 02 | Kanagawa | +2.3% | Strong Tailwind |
| 03 | Shiga | +2.3% | Strong Tailwind |
| 04 | Tokyo | +2.2% | Strong Tailwind |
| 05 | Aichi | +2.2% | Strong Tailwind |
| 06 | Saitama | +2.2% | Strong Tailwind |
| 07 | Chiba | +2% | Strong Tailwind |
| 08 | Ibaraki | +1.9% | Strong Tailwind |
| 09 | Miyagi | +1.9% | Strong Tailwind |
| 10 | Tochigi | +1.8% | Strong Tailwind |
| 11 | Yamanashi | +1.7% | Strong Tailwind |
| 12 | Gunma | +1.7% | Strong Tailwind |
| 13 | Nagano | +1.7% | Strong Tailwind |
| 14 | Shizuoka | +1.6% | Strong Tailwind |
| 15 | Hyogo | +1.6% | Strong Tailwind |
| 16 | Ishikawa | +1.6% | Strong Tailwind |
| 17 | Gifu | +1.6% | Strong Tailwind |
| 18 | Kyoto | +1.5% | Strong Tailwind |
| 19 | Osaka | +1.5% | Mild Tailwind |
| 20 | Mie | +1.5% | Mild Tailwind |
| 21 | Nara | +1.4% | Mild Tailwind |
| 22 | Fukuoka | +1.4% | Mild Tailwind |
| 23 | Fukui | +1.4% | Mild Tailwind |
| 24 | Toyama | +1.4% | Mild Tailwind |
| 25 | Fukushima | +1.3% | Mild Tailwind |
| 26 | Niigata | +1.3% | Mild Tailwind |
| 27 | Okayama | +1.2% | Mild Tailwind |
| 28 | Saga | +1.2% | Mild Tailwind |
| 29 | Hiroshima | +1.2% | Mild Tailwind |
| 30 | Kagawa | +1.1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 31 | Kumamoto | +1.1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 32 | Hokkaido | +1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 33 | Iwate | +1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 34 | Yamagata | +1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 35 | Tottori | +1% | Mild Tailwind |
| 36 | Ehime | +0.9% | Mild Tailwind |
| 37 | Aomori | +0.9% | Mild Tailwind |
| 38 | Tokushima | +0.9% | Mild Tailwind |
| 39 | Wakayama | +0.8% | Mild Tailwind |
| 40 | Nagasaki | +0.8% | Mild Tailwind |
| 41 | Oita | +0.8% | Mild Tailwind |
| 42 | Miyazaki | +0.7% | Mild Tailwind |
| 43 | Shimane | +0.7% | Mild Tailwind |
| 44 | Akita | +0.6% | Mild Tailwind |
| 45 | Kagoshima | +0.5% | Mild Tailwind |
| 46 | Yamaguchi | +0.4% | Mild Tailwind |
| 47 | Kochi | +0.3% | Mild Tailwind |
Household CAGR 2025→2040 · IPSS 2024 · Tokyo highlighted
Diverging bars show the annualized 2025→2040 household CAGR. Bars to the right (green) indicate demographic tailwinds; bars to the left (amber/red) indicate headwinds. Shows the five strongest and five weakest prefectures plus Tokyo for reference.
Young single adults continue migrating toward Tokyo, Fukuoka, and other employment hubs, sustaining renter-pool growth in a handful of prefectures even as the national population declines.
Japan's total population has fallen since 2008, and IPSS projects the decline to accelerate through 2040 — shrinking the household base across most rural prefectures and concentrating demand geographically.
The single-person 65+ household cohort grows in every one of the 47 prefectures as the postwar generations age and more seniors live alone — a structural tailwind for senior housing that is distinct from the youth-rental picture.
Average household size keeps shrinking as marriage rates fall and single-person living rises, so household counts — the actual unit of housing demand — hold up better than raw population in many areas.
A widening split separates a small set of growth prefectures from a long tail of declining ones. Investors increasingly need prefecture- and cohort-level demand signals rather than a single national narrative.
Tatemono IQ users get prefecture- and municipality-level demographic projections, AI-powered property analysis, and the live demand scoring this report is built on.
Start Free TrialWe annualize household change over the 2025→2040 window because it spans a full 15-year investment horizon while staying within the high-confidence near-to-mid term of the IPSS projection series. Shorter windows over-weight near-term census noise; the full 2050 horizon stretches beyond the planning life of most acquisitions. The 15-year window also matches the window used by Tatemono IQ's live tailwind scoring, keeping this report in parity with the product.
The 'Single 25–39' cohort sums projected single-person households across the 25–29, 30–34, and 35–39 age bands — the primary renter pool for compact 1K/1DK units. The 'Single 65+' cohort uses the IPSS pre-aggregated single-person 65-and-over household figure — the demand base for senior housing and accessible rentals.
Both cohorts measure households, not individuals, because the household is the unit at which housing is demanded. A prefecture can lose population while gaining single-person households as average household size shrinks — which is precisely why cohort-level household projections, rather than headline population, drive this scorecard.
Licensing & Rights
Terms of Use & Fair Citation
The underlying household projections are published by IPSS under its own terms of use; please consult the IPSS site for source-data licensing. Tatemono IQ's analysis, rankings, scoring, and visualizations in this report are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share and adapt this material, including for commercial purposes, provided clear attribution is given to Tatemono IQ with a link back to this original page.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicenseCite This Report
Tatemono IQ. (2026). Japan Prefecture Demographic Demand Scorecard. Retrieved from https://www.tatemonoiq.com/en/market-reports/japan-prefecture-demographic-scorecard